Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42752872›Full record

ArticleDie Anaesthesiologie2026

[Hospital care in times of crisis : Are German hospitals prepared for military conflicts?]

E G Pfenninger, M Königsdorfer, S Witte, S Mayer, U X Kaisers, B Friemert

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

E G PfenningerAbteilung für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, SRH-Klinikum Sigmaringen, Sigmaringen, Deutschland. ernst.pfenninger@uni-ulm.de.
M KönigsdorferStabsstelle Resilienz- und Krisenmanagement, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland.
S WitteStabsstelle Resilienz- und Krisenmanagement, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland.
S MayerStabsstelle Strategisches Medizincontrolling, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland.
U X KaisersKlinikumsvorstand, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland.
B FriemertZentrales Klinisches Prozess, Leistungs- und Resourcenmanagement, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsidering the evolving security policy framework conditions in Europe, it is imperative to assess if the German hospital system is prepared to face military conflict scenarios, such as disasters, crises and wars.

methodsThis study was conducted as a narrative literature review and covered the period from January 2020 to June 2026 in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. The study used combinations of the search terms "hospital preparedness", "hospital resilience", "war", "military conflict", "mass casualty incident", "disaster planning", "Germany" and their German language equivalents. The search terms were used both individually and in various combinations. The study included original articles, reviews, guidelines, government reports and health policy publications in both German and English that addressed hospital preparedness for armed conflicts or comparable large-scale disasters. Publications without a direct connection to hospital care in crisis situations as well as those for which the full text was not available, were excluded.

resultsThere are no controlled, randomized and blinded studies (RCT) examining the question whether German hospitals are prepared for military conflicts. The available evidence on this topic consists primarily of expert recommendations, government reports and experiences from current military conflicts. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionGermany has a highly developed civilian healthcare system but recent studies and official risk analyses reveal shortcomings in its preparedness for large-scale military conflicts. There are particular concerns about its ability to handle long-lasting mass casualty incidents (MCI), and the systemic resilience of the healthcare system in general. Experience from the Russia-Ukraine war shows that modern wars generate enormous numbers of seriously injured patients and quickly push the healthcare system to its limits. While smaller influxes of wounded would be manageable, a large-scale military conflict would require additional military, logistical and international support. Challenges lie not only in infrastructure, but also in the availability of qualified personnel and intensive care capacity as well as in logistical resilience. Greater integration of civilian hospitals into national security planning, along with regular exercises and investments in resilience, could be the key to ensuring medical care during a military crisis.

Indexed as

Armed conflictCivil-military cooperationClinical careDefence situationResilience

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.