ArticleFEMS microbiology letters2026
Development and psychometric validation of a community microbiology literacy scale in the context of infectious diseases, antimicrobial resistance, and vaccination.
Article in FEMS microbiology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbiology literacy has become increasingly important for public health and societal resilience, particularly in the context of emerging infectious diseases, antimicrobial resistance, and misinformation. However, standardized instruments for assessing Microbiology literacy at the community level remain limited. This study aimed to develop a valid and reliable tool to assess Microbiology literacy in the general population and to examine its multidimensional structure. This methodological, cross-sectional study developed the Community Microbiology Literacy Scale (CMLS). An initial item pool was generated based on international Microbiology books and World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, followed by expert evaluation and content validity assessment using the Davis technique. Data were collected from 835 adults aged ≥18 years. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted using data from 498 participants without imposing an a priori dimensional structure. A conceptually coherent four-factor structure emerged from the data, and the factors were named according to the content of their constituent items. This structure was subsequently tested by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in an independent subsample of 337 participants. The EFA identified a four-factor structure comprising Basic Microbiology Knowledge, Infection Control Awareness, Antibiotic and Antimicrobial Resistance Awareness, and Vaccine Awareness, explaining 60.66% of the total variance. CFA confirmed acceptable model fit. The scale demonstrated high internal consistency [Cronbach's alpha (α) = 0.925], with subscale Cronbach's α values ranging from 0.793 to 0.896. Higher Microbiology literacy scores were associated with older age, higher educational attainment, being a healthcare professional, prior Biology or Microbiology education, and awareness of the term "Microbiology" (P < .05). No significant differences were observed according to place of residence. The CMLS is a valid, reliable, and multidimensional instrument for assessing community-level Microbiology literacy and may support targeted educational and public health interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.