Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42752841›Full record

ArticleFamily process2026

The AFFIRM Model for Navigating Challenges in Continuously-Interfaith and Divergent-Interfaith Marriages.

Justin J Hendricks, David C Dollahite, Loren D Marks, Sam A Hardy, Chelsea Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family process, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Justin J HendricksThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8373-3629
David C DollahiteBrigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7228-4848
Loren D MarksBrigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.
Sam A HardyBrigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1907-5080
Chelsea JohnsonPrivate Marriage and Family Therapy Practice, St George, Utah, USA.

Funding

The Population Research Institute: Development CoreP2CHD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Brian Thiede · 2016 to 2026
$9.0M
Training Program in Social Environments and Population HealthT32HD007514 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI JOHN D. ICELAND · 1999 to 2026
$5.1M
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development P2C HD041025National Institute of Child Health and Human Development T32HD007514NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041025NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to identify the processes that helped happy and stable interfaith marriages navigate religious differences. To contextualize these adaptive processes, we secondarily explored the interfaith challenges these couples experienced. A final exploratory aim compared these challenges and processes in continuously-interfaith couples who started as and remained interfaith, and divergent-interfaith couples, an understudied subgroup who initially shared a religion but later became interfaith due to religious changes. In-depth interviews were conducted with 30 interfaith couples (N = 60) that had been recruited through purposive sampling who reported being happily married on average 18.7 years. Six core themes were identified through team-based systematic thematic analysis using NVivo. Many couples reported several significant challenges because of their religious differences, as discussed in our first theme. We organized the five themes regarding how couples navigated religious differences to create the AFFIRM model. That is, the adaptive processes we identified in these interfaith couples were that they (a) Assisted and supported each other's practices and beliefs, (b) Focused on similarities of belief, (c) Fostered religious Intimacy and understanding, (d) Respected each other's religious choices, and (e) made Marriage their first and highest priority. Themes are discussed in terms of continuously-interfaith couples (n = 25) and divergent-interfaith couples (n = 5). Interfaith couples may benefit from the progressive addition of the AFFIRM strategies in treatment. Replication of these qualitative findings with other interfaith couples are indicated to refine usefulness of the model.

Indexed as

MarriageReligion and PsychologyAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdultFemaleHumansMaledivergent‐interfaithinterfaithqualitativereligion and familyreligious heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID42752841
PMCPMC13584837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.