ReviewInternational journal of hematology2026
Current perspectives on non-factor therapies for hemophilia.
Review in International journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemophilia is an inherited bleeding disorder caused by deficiency of coagulation factor VIII or IX and results in impaired thrombin generation and recurrent bleeding. Prophylactic factor replacement remains the standard treatment; however, its limitations, including the burden of intravenous treatment, inhibitor development, and residual bleeding, necessitate alternative strategies. Non-factor therapies restore hemostatic balance independently of factor replacement. These agents include factor VIIIa-mimetic bispecific antibodies and rebalancing therapies that enhance thrombin generation by inhibiting anticoagulant pathways such as tissue factor pathway inhibitor or antithrombin. Regardless of inhibitor status, non-factor therapies reduce bleeding rates, provide sustained prophylactic efficacy, and improve quality of life in patients with hemophilia A or B. However, several significant challenges remain unresolved. Because these therapies modify physiological procoagulant and anticoagulant pathways, excessive rebalancing may increase thrombotic risk, particularly when additional factor concentrates or bypassing agents are used for breakthrough bleeding or surgery. Furthermore, standardized laboratory assays for assessing global hemostatic potential are lacking, and long-term safety, optimal patient selection, and perioperative management require further clarification. Therefore, this review summarizes current and emerging non-factor therapies for hemophilia, focusing on their mechanisms of action, clinical evidence, safety considerations, unmet needs, and future perspectives for safe implementation in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42752815What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.