Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42752757›Full record

ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026

Predicting 30-day unplanned readmissions in patients with cancer in a Brazilian hospital: a Machine Learning approach.

Nickolas Stabellini, Marilia Melo Favalesso, Claudia Szlejf, Cesar Gomes Miguel, Roberto Carmagnani Pestana, Hanna Kim, Gabriela de Carvalho Ferreira, Kristin A Waite, Alberto J Montero, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nickolas StabelliniCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3135-7980
Marilia Melo FavalessoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4441-0960
Claudia SzlejfHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0569-1184
Cesar Gomes MiguelHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-2141-7233
Roberto Carmagnani PestanaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1141-7608
Hanna KimHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Gabriela de Carvalho FerreiraFaculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3427-3765
Kristin A WaiteWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3186-8510
Alberto J MonteroDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8221-8120
Jill S Barnholtz-SloanWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6190-9304
Edson Amaro JuniorHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5889-1382
Nelson HamerschlakHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5140-5310

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to develop Machine Learning models to predict 30-day unplanned readmissions in cancer patients treated at a private hospital in Brazil.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included admission records of hospitalizations lasting >24 hours, with a corresponding diagnosis of a solid malignancy. The primary outcome was 30-day unplanned readmission. We tested five supervised Machine Learning algorithms to develop predictive models: a "48-hour" model, which used data from the first 48 hours after admission, and a "discharge" model, which used data from the entire hospitalization. The optimal models were selected based on their median performance (area under the ROC curve [AUC], precision, recall, F1, and Fβ-Score). Model explainability was assessed using SHAP scores (SS).

resultsWe analyzed 3,728 admissions from 1,573 cancer patients, with an unplanned 30-day readmission rate of 21.13%. The Random Forest algorithm demonstrated the best-balanced performance for the 48-hour model (AUC = 0.70, IQR= 0.68-0.71), whereas LightGBM performed best for the discharge model (AUC = 0.70, IQR= 0.68-0.72). In both models, the top predictor was prior emergency department visits in the past six months (SS=0.074 and 0.053, respectively). The top 10 predictors included: laboratory values (including lymphocyte count, Gamma-glutamyl transferase, Red Cell Distribution Width, hemoglobin, sodium, monocyte count, hematocrit, and urea), vital signs, and emergency index admission in both models, with colon cancer ranking among the top predictors in the 48-hour model.

conclusionThe models underscored the significance of prior emergency department visits, laboratory values, and vital signs as key predictors of 30-day unplanned readmission. The timing of laboratory and vitals influenced their predictive strength. Implementing these models could help providers develop personalized care strategies to reduce readmission risk. External validation is needed.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeoplasmsPatient ReadmissionAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsBrazilClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID42752757
PMCPMC13682789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.