ArticleJournal of vision2026
Model-based estimation of the population contrast response function in human visual cortex.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Contrast determines how strong visual stimuli drive neural responses and, in turn, how well we can see. This contrast-response relationship is nonlinear, with gain control mechanisms acting to compress responses to high-contrast stimuli, effectively setting the contrast range that neural responses are most sensitive to. Yet, capturing these saturating responses noninvasively in human functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has proven challenging. Here, we introduce a model-based fMRI approach to more flexibly and efficiently estimate saturating contrast responses: population contrast response function (CRF) mapping. To vet this technique, we benchmarked pCRF mapping against traditional deconvolved BOLD responses for stimuli presented with a fast event-related design. We found tight correspondence in parameter estimates between the deconvolution-derived CRF and pCRF estimates, validating the model-based approach. We then asked whether pCRF mapping could push beyond conventional paradigms by employing a continuous, highly condition-rich stimulation design that affords greater efficiency and flexibility but does not lend itself to traditional fMRI analyses. As predicted by the model-based approach, voxel-wise pCRF estimates could still be recovered from this unconventional design. In sum, we demonstrated that model-based pCRF mapping dissociates CRF estimation from strict design constraints and broadens the space of usable experimental paradigms while still capturing the saturating nonlinearities that are fundamental to neural population responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.