Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42752742›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

Model-based estimation of the population contrast response function in human visual cortex.

Louis N Vinke, Sam Ling, Ilona M Bloem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Louis N VinkeDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Sam LingPsychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Ilona M BloemInstitute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

How Does Normalization Regulate Visual Competition?R01EY028163 · NEI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI SAM LING · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
Investigating the Effect of Arousal on Visual ProcessingR01EY035640 · NEI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI Janneke Jehee, SAM LING · 2024 to 2026
$1.0M
Testing a Dynamic Spatiotemporal Normalization Framework for Human VisionR01EY037358 · NEI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI Rachel Denison · 2025 to 2026
$967k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028163NEI NIH HHS R01 EY035640NEI NIH HHS R01 EY037358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrast determines how strong visual stimuli drive neural responses and, in turn, how well we can see. This contrast-response relationship is nonlinear, with gain control mechanisms acting to compress responses to high-contrast stimuli, effectively setting the contrast range that neural responses are most sensitive to. Yet, capturing these saturating responses noninvasively in human functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has proven challenging. Here, we introduce a model-based fMRI approach to more flexibly and efficiently estimate saturating contrast responses: population contrast response function (CRF) mapping. To vet this technique, we benchmarked pCRF mapping against traditional deconvolved BOLD responses for stimuli presented with a fast event-related design. We found tight correspondence in parameter estimates between the deconvolution-derived CRF and pCRF estimates, validating the model-based approach. We then asked whether pCRF mapping could push beyond conventional paradigms by employing a continuous, highly condition-rich stimulation design that affords greater efficiency and flexibility but does not lend itself to traditional fMRI analyses. As predicted by the model-based approach, voxel-wise pCRF estimates could still be recovered from this unconventional design. In sum, we demonstrated that model-based pCRF mapping dissociates CRF estimation from strict design constraints and broadens the space of usable experimental paradigms while still capturing the saturating nonlinearities that are fundamental to neural population responses.

Indexed as

Brain MappingContrast SensitivityModels, NeurologicalVisual CortexAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42752742
PMCPMC13602153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.