ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Perioperative adverse events and device malfunctions associated with ROSA cranial stereotactic robotic surgery a descriptive analysis of FDA MAUDE reports from 2016 to 2026.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We characterized perioperative adverse events and device malfunctions involving ROSA cranial stereotactic robotic systems in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. Reports received from 1 January 2016 through 31 July 2026 were identified using ROSA-specific brand and 510(k) searches under FDA product code HAW, with date segmentation. In the frozen dataset, deduplication yielded 1,277 unique ROSA medical device reports (MDRs); 155 were excluded and 1,122 were analysed. Two reviewers independently coded reports, followed by third senior reviewer review. Descriptive results used final consensus classifications. The ROSA cohort contained 880 (78.4%) Malfunctions, 241 (21.5%) Injuries, and 1 (0.1%) Death. Software/imaging/data (455; 40.6%) and registration/accuracy/calibration (235; 20.9%) were the leading failure domains. No reported harm was coded in 1,057 (94.2%) MDRs. Restart/reboot/power-cycle was the leading management response (392; 34.9%), and procedure delay was the leading procedural outcome (529; 47.1%). ROSA reports frequently described software, imaging, registration, and workflow disruptions. These patterns can inform equipment checks, registration verification, troubleshooting, backup pathways, and training. Report proportions do not estimate harm incidence or establish causality. The partial 2026 interval is not comparable with complete calendar years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42752740What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.