Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42752728›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2026

Clinical activity of platinum rechallenge with nedaplatin plus irinotecan in recurrent cervical cancer following prior platinum-based systemic chemotherapy: a single-center retrospective study.

Yoshifumi Takahashi, Yuji Takei, Miku Takadera, Masahiro Taguchi, Nozomi Ogawara, Eri Suizu, Kazuki Yamamoto, Kohei Tamura, Miki Shinohara, Takahiro Koyanagi and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yoshifumi TakahashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan. ytakahashi@jichi.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3319-1205
Yuji TakeiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Miku TakaderaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Masahiro TaguchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Nozomi OgawaraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Eri SuizuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Kazuki YamamotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Kohei TamuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Miki ShinoharaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Takahiro KoyanagiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Akiyo TaneichiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Yasushi SagaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Hiroyuki FujiwaraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment options remain limited for patients with recurrent cervical cancer following prior platinum-based systemic chemotherapy. Despite the activity of nedaplatin plus irinotecan in recurrent cervical cancer, its clinical value as a platinum rechallenge regimen following prior platinum-based systemic chemotherapy remains unclear. This study examined the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy in this setting.

methodsPatients with recurrent cervical cancer who received at least 1 cycle of nedaplatin plus irinotecan after recurrence or progression following prior platinum-based systemic chemotherapy at Jichi Medical University Hospital between January 2018 and December 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment efficacy and safety were evaluated, and survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsThis study included 26 patients. The median platinum-free interval was 3 months, and 21 patients received nedaplatin plus irinotecan as a second-line platinum-containing systemic chemotherapy. The objective response rate among patients with measurable disease was 23.8%, whereas the disease control rate among all evaluable patients was 53.8%. The median progression-free survival was 5.0 months, whereas the median overall survival was 22.5 months. Grade ≥ 3 hematologic adverse events included neutropenia in 15 patients, anemia in 9, and thrombocytopenia in 5. No treatment-related death occurred.

conclusionsNedaplatin plus irinotecan demonstrated clinically meaningful activity with manageable toxicity in selected patients with recurrent cervical cancer following prior platinum-based systemic chemotherapy. Platinum rechallenge may be a potential treatment option in this setting, although further studies are warranted to identify patients most likely to benefit.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerIrinotecanNedaplatinPlatinum-free intervalPlatinum rechallenge

Identifiers

PMID42752728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.