ArticlePlant reproduction2026
Assessing the relative contributions of different Arabidopsis thaliana stigma factors to pollen hydration.
Article in Plant reproduction, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Following pollination, Arabidopsis pollen grains rapidly hydrate through the transfer of water from the stigma to the pollen. Several stigma regulators of pollen hydration have been identified, and the corresponding mutants generally support milder defects in wildtype Col-0 pollen hydration, signifying the involvement of other unidentified factors in this process. Here, we uncovered a role for the stigma-specific mechanosensitive channel gene, MscS-Like 7 (MSL7), in supporting pollen hydration. While the msl7 mutant stigmas were found to support reduced hydration of wildtype Col-0 pollen, the phenotype was quite mild and very similar to that observed for other published pollen hydration mutants. Thus, we conducted a detailed comparison of different pollen hydration mutants on the stigma side (receptor kinases, PIP aquaporins) and pollen (PCP-Bs, MSL8) to compare pollen hydration mutant phenotypes and look for any additive effects of combining different mutants. Overall, all combinations resulted in the same mild hydration defect with no additional reductions in pollen hydration and no impact on pollen germination. This is in contrast to that observed for self-incompatible (SI) pollen from a transgenic Arabidopsis SI Col-0 line which shows very little pollen hydration and no pollen germination as part of the SI pollen rejection response. Together, these findings suggest that the regulation of compatible pollen hydration is quite complex and that there are likely other unknown mechanisms involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42752706What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.