ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
How Long and How We Judge Age: A Cross-Racial and Cross-Gender Eye-Tracking Investigation.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFacial aging results from genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors, leading to wrinkles, volume loss, and contour changes. These alterations affect perceived age, attractiveness, and self-image. Eye-tracking technology provides insights into gaze patterns, revealing how specific facial regions influence age-related judgments.
objectiveThis study aimed to examine the role of different facial regions in rapid age estimation, with a specific focus on the midface. We investigated decision times, gaze patterns, and their implications for aesthetic interventions, particularly for middle-aged individuals. MATERIALS AND
methodsFifty-four participants evaluated 60 digitally generated facial images representing diverse ethnicities, genders, and three age groups (young, middle-aged, and older). Eye movements were recorded using a Tobii Pro Nano eye tracker. The custom-defined Times of Interest (TOIs) were defined as the decision times for categorizing images as "young" or "old". Fixation durations were analyzed for predefined Areas of Interest (AOIs), including the upper face, midface, and lower face, further subdivided into left and right sides. Non-parametric statistical tests were used to identify differences between groups.
resultsDecision times were significantly longer for middle-aged stimuli (1489.49 ± 1055.56 ms; p < 0.001) compared to young (1021.98 ± 480.24 ms) and older stimuli (1048.31 ± 726.03 ms). Stable fixation duration was longest for the midface (863.50 ± 564.48 ms; p < 0.001), followed by the lower face (105.99 ± 238.70 ms) and upper face (25.34 ± 116.42 ms). Middle-aged stimuli consistently elicited the longest fixation times across all regions (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between male and female stimuli for midface fixation (p = 0.393). However, male stimuli attracted longer fixations in the upper face (p = 0.001), while female stimuli drew attention to the lower face (p = 0.039). Right-sided facial regions consistently received longer fixation durations across all stimuli characteristics (p < 0.001). Asian participants showed shorter fixation times in the midface but longer fixations on the lower face compared to Caucasian participants (p < 0.001).
conclusionThe midface emerged as the focal region for age perception, with its structural prominence and association with age-related changes driving prolonged visual attention. Longer decision times for middle-aged faces reflect their complexity, requiring detailed processing of both youthful and aging features. These findings underscore the importance of prioritizing the midface in aesthetic interventions, particularly for middle-aged patients. Understanding gaze patterns can guide aesthetic providers in developing personalized, effective rejuvenation strategies that align with natural age perception mechanisms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42752663What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.