Observational studyAnnals of hematology2026
Outcomes of down syndrome-related myeloid leukemia in Turkiye: a multicenter retrospective observational cohort study by the Turkish Pediatric Hematology Association.
Observational study in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children with Down syndrome (DS) have a 150-times increased risk of myeloid leukemia (ML). In DS patients, in addition to DS-ML, common acute myeloid leukemia (AML) subtypes (standard-AML), observed in patients without DS, may also be seen. We evaluated ML types developing among DS cases, along with clinical features, survival, relapse, and mortality rates. The study included DS children aged 6 months to 18 years with newly diagnosed ML. Patients were classified retrospectively into two groups according to WHO guidelines and BFM-AML protocol recommendations as DS-ML and standard AML-DS. Among 53 DS patients, 71.7% (n = 38) had DS-ML and 28.3% (n = 15) had standard AML-DS. The mean age in the DS-ML group was significantly lower than the standard AML-DS group (23 ± 9 vs. 48 ± 51 months, p = 0.033). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) in the DS-ML group were 84.1%±6.0% and 81.3%±6.4%, respectively. For the standard AML, OS and EFS were 53.3%±12.9% and 45.7%±13.1%, respectively. The DS-ML group had significantly higher OS and EFS than the standard AML-DS group (p = 0.039 and p = 0.025, respectively). In our study, DS-ML and standard AML-DS were evaluated separately, which significantly contributes to the literature on the clinical and laboratory features of both groups, given the limited data on these topics. In the DS-ML group, complete remission, OS, and EFS were significantly higher than in the standard AML-DS. Differentiating DS-ML from standard AML-DS will ensure that patients with these biologically distinct diseases receive treatment of appropriate intensity and increase survival by reducing early mortality and relapse risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.