ReviewPediatric cardiology2026
Mechanics of Balloon and Stent Angioplasty in Congenital Heart Interventions.
Review in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcatheter treatment of vascular obstruction, including balloon angioplasty and stent implantation, is central to the management of congenital heart disease (CHD). The success and safety of these procedures depend on complex mechanical interactions among abnormal vessels, adjacent "normal" segments, surrounding tissues, balloons, and stents. However, these biomechanical relationships have not been comprehensively reviewed for congenital interventional cardiologists. This review summarizes the mechanical principles most relevant to catheter-based therapy in CHD. First, we outline the biomechanical behavior of normal large vessels, especially the aorta and pulmonary arteries, including wall structure, anisotropy, nonlinear stress-strain behavior, residual stress, compliance and stress concentrations at bifurcations and curved segments. We then examine how congenital, postoperative, and acquired vascular abnormalities alter these properties and influence procedural response. Next, we review balloon mechanics, including compliance, inflation dynamics, balloon-vessel interaction, and the relationship among balloon diameter, pressure, lesion geometry, and vessel injury. Finally, we discuss the mechanics of balloon-expandable stents, including crimping, deployment, recoil, shortening, dog-boning, redilation, fracture, fatigue, and the influence of stent design and material properties on performance. Across all intervention types, clinical outcomes are shaped not only by lesion anatomy but also by local mechanical environments that remain incompletely defined and vary substantially among patients and lesions. A better understanding of these principles may improve procedural planning, device selection, risk assessment, and interpretation of acute and late outcomes after transcatheter intervention in CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42752657What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.