ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Testing for Aspirin Resistance in Pediatric Patients with Single Ventricle and Ductal Stented Cardiac Disease: A Single Center Quality Improvement Initiative.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid, ASA) is the standard of care for thrombosis prevention in patients with single-ventricle physiology and ductal stents. Although weight-based dosing is widely used, there is no consensus on optimal methods to assess adequate platelet inhibition. While platelet inhibition testing was available at our institution, utilization was infrequent, and a standardized approach was lacking. Clinical events prompted interest in systematic application of testing in this population. We applied quality improvement methodology to implement VerifyNow Aspirin (VN) testing to evaluate platelet inhibition in this high-risk cohort. Initial barriers included limited awareness of test availability, miscommunication regarding age eligibility, and inadequate electronic medical record support. Through iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, VN testing completion increased from 25 to 87% of eligible patients. Observed rates of ASA resistance were consistent with published literature, and dose adjustments achieved adequate platelet inhibition in 93% of patients. This project demonstrated the feasibility of routine assessment of ASA responsiveness in a vulnerable pediatric cardiac population. Future studies should evaluate the association between platelet inhibition and clinical thrombosis outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42752654What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.