Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42752628›Full record

ReviewMedicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents2026

Artificial intelligence-assisted lead optimization in drug discovery: bridging computational advances and translational challenges.

Fatma AlZahraa A A Mohamed, Ahmed Mohsen Kamal El-Sagheir

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fatma AlZahraa A A MohamedMedicinal Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Assiut University, Assiut, 71526, Egypt.
Ahmed Mohsen Kamal El-SagheirMedicinal Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Assiut University, Assiut, 71526, Egypt. ahmad.kamal@pharm.aun.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5034-1495

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lead optimization is a resource-intensive stage of drug discovery requiring the simultaneous optimization of potency, selectivity, pharmacokinetics, safety, and synthetic feasibility. Although artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have substantially advanced predictive modeling, virtual screening, de novo molecular design, and multiparameter optimization, their translation into routine medicinal chemistry remains challenging. This review critically examines current AI approaches for lead optimization, emphasizing the gap between computational benchmark performance and practical medicinal chemistry applications. Recent advances in graph neural networks (GNNs), transformer architectures, diffusion models, and chemical foundation models have expanded AI-assisted molecular design and property prediction. We further discuss emerging concepts including data-centric AI, uncertainty quantification, trustworthy AI, the AI optimization paradox, and the shift from molecular prediction toward scientific decision-making as key determinants of successful implementation. Despite increasing industrial adoption, AI remains dependent on high-quality experimental data, model generalizability, and rigorous experimental validation. We conclude that future progress will depend less on increasingly sophisticated algorithms than on trustworthy AI systems that improve scientific decision-making within iterative lead optimization workflows and ultimately enhance translational success in drug discovery.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDrug discoveryLead optimizationMedicinal chemistryTrustworthy AI

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.