Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42752617›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

A medically grounded LLM agent-based tool to detect patient safety events in medical records.

Diego Trujillo, Dulin Wang, Nathan Bahr, Tina Yi-Jin Hsieh, Byeongyeon Cho, Garth Meckler, Matthew Hansen, Carl Eriksson, Kyu Seo Kim, Steven Bedrick and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Diego TrujilloCenter for Learning Health Care Delivery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Dulin WangMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, UTHealth, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Nathan BahrDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Tina Yi-Jin HsiehDepartment of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6296-0689
Byeongyeon ChoCenter for Learning Health Care Delivery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1370-2629
Garth MecklerDepartment of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Matthew HansenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Carl ErikssonDepartment of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Kyu Seo KimDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Steven BedrickDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Xiaoqian JiangMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, UTHealth, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9933-2205
Jeanne-Marie GuiseCenter for Learning Health Care Delivery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8961-488X

Funding

Using Machine Learning to find a life saving needle in a haystack of children's emergenciesR01HL161385 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GUISE, JEANNE-MARIE · 2022 to 2025
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL161385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have shown incredible promise in medicine. While LLMs may be particularly useful in areas requiring extensive review of clinical records, their use remains limited due to their tendency to hallucinate and fabricate information. Hallucination issues, as well as their consequences, are exacerbated in low-probability, high-stakes scenarios such as rare adverse safety events or medical errors. We present SAFE-AI (Structured and Automated Framework for Explainable AI), a novel method for clinical decision making that combines the strengths of clinical expert knowledge with LLMs in an ontology-driven model that minimizes hallucinations using strict rules. We test this method to identify medication errors in medical charts. We collected a sample of 18,402 lines of clinical information from 300 EMS clinical charts that were independently dually reviewed by two expert physicians for epinephrine adverse safety events (ASEs), with 96% inter-rater agreement. We tested SAFE-AI against these labels, achieving similar performance to human experts in detecting epinephrine overdoses with 97.9% accuracy, and 91.6% accuracy in identifying delays in epinephrine administration, greatly outperforming baseline LLMs models. Notably, some disagreements between clinicians and the model were found to be justifiable differences in judgment rather than errors. SAFE-AI presents a novel approach for clinical AI applications that addresses two key limitations of current machine learning methods: 1) over-reliance on probabilistic pattern recognition instead of established medical knowledge, and 2) perpetuation of biases present in training data. This framework is easily adaptable to a range of clinical applications, paving the way for provable and trustworthy AI in medicine.

Identifiers

PMID42752617
PMCPMC13585220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.