Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42752612›Full record

ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2026

Association between CAR T-cell persistence and improved response to salvage radiotherapy in patients with DLBCL.

Jiaqi Fan, Nadine Kutsch, Jan-Michel Heger, Philipp Gödel, Eva Heger, Henning Gruell, Philipp Linde, Simone Ferdinandus, Johannes Rosenbrock, Hendrik Dapper and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jiaqi FanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. jiaqi.fan@uk-koeln.de.ORCID 0009-0002-8418-3192
Nadine KutschDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9559-8575
Jan-Michel HegerDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Cancer Center Cologne Essen, Partner Site Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Cologne Lymphoma Working Group (CLWG), Cologne, Germany; Mildred Scheel School of Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (MSSO ABCD), Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Philipp GödelDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Eva HegerInstitute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7625-5139
Henning GruellInstitute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0725-7138
Philipp LindeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Simone FerdinandusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Johannes RosenbrockDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Hendrik DapperDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Emmanouil FokasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Peter BorchmannDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3782-2158
Christian BauesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Marienhospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeWhile Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), over half of patients relapse within 1 year with poor prognosis. Salvage radiotherapy (sRT) achieves high local response rates, but which subgroups benefit most and whether CAR T-cell persistence influences sRT response remains unclear. Patient/material and methods: We retrospectively analyzed DLBCL patients receiving sRT after CAR T-cell therapy at our center. CAR transgene levels were quantified by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and associations between CAR T-cell kinetics at relapse, sRT response, and survival were evaluated.

resultsCAR transgene data were available for 13 patients, (18 lesions treated with sRT). Toxicity was mild (grade ≤ 2). The local response rate was 83% (15/18 lesions). Three CAR transgene kinetic patterns were identified at relapse: increased-CAR (second increase in transgene levels, n = 4), persisted-CAR (persistence > 6 months, n = 4), and decreased-CAR (decline or absence, n = 5). Local response rates were 100% in both the increased- and persisted-CAR groups versus 57% (4/7 lesions) in the decreased-CAR group, 12-month local control rates were 83, 100, and 14%, respectively. Twelve-month overall survival was 100% in both increased-CAR and persisted-CAR groups versus 20% in the decreased-CAR group.

interpretationsRT may provide durable local control in relapsed DLBCL after CAR T-cell therapy. Persistent CAR T-cell activity at relapse may help identify patients most likely to benefit from comprehensive sRT. Given the small, heterogeneous cohort, these findings are hypothesis-generating and require validation in larger series.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReceptors, Chimeric AntigenSalvage TherapyT-LymphocytesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID42752612
PMCPMC13592027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.