Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42752576›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

Assisting patients with reliable information gathering: A guide to building efficient QA systems for medical use.

Zhipeng Yin, Zichong Wang, Min Chen, Ian Stockwell, Xin Ning, Jun Liu, Wenbin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhipeng YinFlorida International University, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Zichong WangFlorida International University, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Min ChenFlorida International University, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Ian StockwellUniversity of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Xin NingFlorida International University, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Jun LiuCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3808-4599
Wenbin ZhangFlorida International University, Miami, Florida, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of question-answering (QA) systems in the medical domain has rapidly advanced, significantly improving patients' access to reliable health-related information. However, current approaches face notable challenges, including the difficulty in obtaining large-scale and unbiased medical datasets, significant privacy concerns, and inefficiencies due to manual dataset annotation. To address these issues, This study introduce a novel methodology leveraging publicly accessible online health forums to systematically build an unbiased, privacy-conscious QA dataset, and it employs Topic-guided Semantic Modeling (TGSM) for automated topic identification, enabling efficient and targeted annotation of relevant patient-generated content. Subsequently, this study propose a two-stage QA pipeline based on a Retriever-Reader architecture, which is further enhanced through fine-tuning state-of-the-art transformer-based models on the constructed domain-specific QA dataset. Experimental results demonstrate that our fine-tuned BioBERT significantly outperforms existing benchmarks, offering accurate patient-derived insights and providing a replicable framework for building efficient medical QA systems.

Identifiers

PMID42752576
PMCPMC13585261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.