ArticlePloS one2026
Functional organization and natural scene responses across mouse visual cortical areas revealed with encoding manifolds.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How 'Neural' is a Neural Foundation Model?ArXiv · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A challenge in sensory neuroscience is understanding how populations of neurons operate in concert to represent diverse stimuli. To meet this challenge, we have created "encoding manifolds" that reveal the overall responses of brain areas to diverse stimuli and organize individual neurons in stimulus-response coordinates according to their selectivity and response dynamics. Here we use encoding manifolds to compare the population-level encoding of primary visual cortex (VISp) with that of five higher visual areas (VISam, VISal, VISpm, VISlm, and VISrl), using data from the Allen Institute Visual Coding-Neuropixels dataset from the mouse. We show that the topology of the encoding manifold for VISp and for higher visual areas is continuous, with smooth coordinates along which stimulus selectivity and response dynamics are organized with layer and cell-type specificity. Surprisingly, the manifolds revealed novel relationships between how natural scenes are encoded relative to static gratings-a relationship conserved across visual areas. Namely, neurons preferring natural scenes preferred either low or high spatial frequency gratings, but not intermediate ones. Analyzing responses by cortical layer reveals a preference for gratings concentrated in layer 6, whereas preferences for natural scenes tended to be higher in layers 2/3 and 4. The results demonstrate how machine learning approaches can be used to organize and visualize the structure of sensory coding, thereby revealing novel relationships within and across brain areas and sensory stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.