ArticlePloS one2026
Examining the mental health support needs of NHS staff exposed to patient pregnancy and neonatal loss: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPregnancy and neonatal loss, including miscarriage, stillbirth, termination for fetal abnormality, and neonatal death, affects a substantial proportion of pregnancies in the UK. Although the impact on patients is well documented, less attention has been paid to the experiences of NHS staff providing care during these events. STUDY
aimsTo explore staff experiences of exposure to pregnancy and neonatal loss, perceptions of available support, support previously used, and needed or wanted.
methodsThis qualitative study used a reflective thematic approach. Semi-structured interviewed were conducted with 20 purposefully sampled clinical, allied and non-clinical staff from a single UK NHS trust. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymised and analysed using thematic analysis, with themes mapped to the study aims. Results: Six themes were identified: (1) nobody prepared me for this (2) reaching a tipping point; (3) peer support versus inconsistent organisational support; (4) reliance on informal support networks; (5) bereavement team and multi-disciplinary support buffer the stressful effects of loss; and (6) one size does not fit all. Exposure varied in type, frequency, and intensity across roles. Many staff, particularly junior, allied and support staff, felt underprepared for the emotional and communication challenges of pregnancy and neonatal loss. Participants described reaching a "tipping point" where resilience was compromised. Peer support was the most accessible and reliable resource, whereas organisational support was underused despite being valued.
conclusionThe emotional demands experienced by NHS staff are inconsistently supported. Findings highlight a "tipping point" where cumulative exposure to pregnancy and neonatal loss can overwhelm coping capacity, particularly among staff in junior, allied and support roles who often report lower levels of preparation and access to formal support. A proactive multi-disciplinary approach is needed to provide visible and equitable support tailored to diverse staff needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.