ArticlePloS one2026
Sensor-based measurement of fear avoidance and movement patterns of healthy individuals with mechanically induced lower back pain during movement tasks: Study protocol for an experimental non-interventional study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic primary low back pain (CPLBP) is highly prevalent and associated with physical impairment and psychological distress. Fear avoidance (FA) is one contributing factor in the development and persistence of CPLBP. Previous studies proved existing connections between pain, physical activity, stress, and FA, which is also present in pain-free individuals. However, the roles of FA and psychophysiological stress responses have not been systematically disentangled and related to movement patterns combined in one standardized experiment involving pain induction.
methodsTo address this gap, 76 pain-free participants (20: phase 1; 56: phase 2) will perform standardized movement tasks (Back Performance Scale, Sit-To-Stand-Test) with and without wearing a back pain simulator in a within-subject design. Movement will be recorded with wearable sensor-based and novel radar-based motion capture technology. Additionally, psychophysiological stress parameters (e.g., salivary cortisol, heart rate variability), and self-reports on stress, pain, and FA will be assessed. This will be followed by a qualitative feasibility and acceptability interview in phase 1. In this phase, we will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a novel back pain simulator enabling a standardized simulation of low back pain, and the motion capture technology. Phase 2 will investigate the effects of pain induction on self-reported pain, back pain-related movement parameters, and stress responses. Associations of these factors with FA will be analyzed. We anticipate high feasibility and acceptability. We expect higher pain ratings, lower mobility, and higher stress responses in the pain condition compared to the control condition. We expect FA to moderate mobility and stress responses in the pain condition. DISCUSSION: This study protocol establishes an experimental paradigm to investigate the association of pain, FA, movement, and stress in healthy samples under controlled pain conditions. This paradigm aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of the interplay of psychological and physiological mechanisms in CPLBP.
trial registrationOSF, osf-registrations-rt2ca-v1. Registered April 2, 2025, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RT2CA; osf-registrations-vsmce-v1. Registered September 18, 2025, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VSMCE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.