ArticlePloS one2026
"I had your number on speed dial:" A qualitative study of patient experiences of dietetics care and managing nutrition during curative treatment of upper gastrointestinal cancer.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLimited research exists on the implementation of nutrition care pathways to provide dietetics care in upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery, particularly from the patient perspective. This study aimed to understand patients' experiences and perceptions of dietetics care provided via a nutrition care pathway, both before and after curative intent surgery. The secondary aim was to explore patients' experiences of self-managing nutrition throughout their treatment trajectory and the impact on quality of life.
methodsThis was a single-centre, prospective phenomenological study. Patients undergoing curative neoadjuvant therapy and surgery for oesophageal or gastric cancer were invited to participate in two semi-structured interviews: 1) in the period between completion of neoadjuvant therapy and surgery; 2) at 3 months post-surgical discharge. Questions pertaining to experiences and perspectives regarding dietetics intervention, nutritional status, symptoms, and quality of life were asked as per the interview schedule. Data were analysed and coded thematically using a phenomenological approach.
resultsThirteen participants were included (12 with oesophageal cancer and one with gastric cancer; mean age 63 years, 62% male). Four main themes were identified: 1) lived experiences of nutritional changes during treatment and recovery; 2) perceptions of nutrition and role of the dietitian; 3) feeding tubes and oral supplements as "the necessary evil"; and 4) impact of treatment and nutritional changes on daily life.
conclusionsParticipants experienced significant nutritional challenges throughout the treatment trajectory, greatly impacting on daily life and psychosocial wellbeing. Participants found the dietetics care provided under the nutrition care pathway to be highly beneficial and acceptable, and dietitians were deemed an essential resource. The findings suggest that intensive, individualised nutrition care pathways, including oral and enteral supplementation, would be beneficial in similar clinical contexts, with peer support identified as an area for further resourcing and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.