ArticlePLoS medicine2026
Accelerometer-derived real-world sleep stages and risk of incident diseases: A UK Biobank cohort study and phenome-wide association analysis.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies utilizing self-reported data or polysomnography have found that poor sleep quality is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. However, the association between real-world sleep patterns, including sleep stages, duration, and fragmentation, measured objectively with physiological data and the risk of incident disease among middle-aged and older adults has not yet been systematically evaluated. METHODS AND
findingsIn this cohort study, we analyzed wrist-worn accelerometer data from 95,559 Biobank participants and derived key metrics of real-world sleep patterns: rapid eye movement [REM], N1, N2, and N3; total sleep duration; sleep irregularity; and wakefulness after sleep onset using the SleepNet algorithm. Participants were followed up from the date of accelerometer wear until the first occurrence of disease, death, or April 1, 2024 with median follow-up length of 8.9 years. Phenome-wide association analysis and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazard regression, with adjustment for demographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, and environmental exposures, to map an atlas of associations between real-world sleep patterns and the incidence of 1,049 health outcomes. We found that variations in sleep patterns were associated with 156 incidences of diseases. Specifically, higher amount of REM sleep and deep sleep were associated with lower risks of 83 and 7 diseases, respectively, while greater sleep irregularity and increased WASO were linked to elevated risks of 3 and 6 diseases, respectively. RCS analyses revealed significant non-linear relationships between sleep duration and 86 disease phenotypes (P for nonlinear <0.05), with the minimum-risk hours for 69 phenotypes predominantly concentrated within the 6-8 hours window. In the category-specific analysis, individuals with extreme short sleep (<5 hours) exhibited the most widespread clinical vulnerabilities, accounting for 37 of the 41 identified significant adverse associations compared to the 6-8 hours reference group. The main limitation of this study was its observational design, which remains susceptible to residual confounding and precludes causal inference.
conclusionIn summary, this study characterizes real-world sleep patterns and their links to disease risk across multiple systems, highlighting the differential contributions of sleep stages and sleep duration. The findings underscore that maintaining 6-8 hours of sleep is associated with a more favorable sleep architecture and lower disease risk, offering insights for prevention and health promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.