ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Cross-feeding enables robust coexistence between four bacterial species.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross-feeding enables robust coexistence between four bacterial species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Resource supply is generally considered a dominant driver of microbial diversity. Here, using a four-species bacterial consortium, we asked whether coexistence can emerge from interactions between species rather than being dictated by the external environment. Across 31 simple nutrient conditions, including 16 single-resource environments, all four species survived and coexisted over eight growth-and-dilution cycles. We then chose 28 additional conditions to further probe the boundaries of coexistence by varying resource concentrations, temporal dynamics, nutrient complexity and relief of auxotrophy-driven dependencies, and only observed the extinction of a single species in one of these conditions. Although the community composition in each environment was largely shaped by species' fitness on the supplied resources, experimental assays and consumer-resource modeling showed that the coexistence was explained by cross-feeding and niche partitioning of metabolic byproducts. These metabolic interactions were strong enough to sustain coexistence even for species that failed to exhibit significant growth on the supplied resources in monoculture. Furthermore, robust coexistence across environments appears to be an emergent property of the community itself, ingrained in the members' metabolic byproduct profiles and niche differences. These findings demonstrate that the richness of microbial consortia is ultimately governed by these intrinsic metabolic traits, rather than being strictly dictated by the number or identity of the externally supplied resource.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.