Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42752228›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Cross-feeding enables robust coexistence between four bacterial species.

Snorre Sulheim, Miguel Teixeira, Eric Ulrich, Alisson Gillon, Samuele E A Testa, Prajwal Padmanabha, Daniel Machado, Sara Mitri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Cross-feeding enables robust coexistence between four bacterial species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Snorre SulheimDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3967-1683
Miguel TeixeiraDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6286-2958
Eric UlrichDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland.
Alisson GillonDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0007-5541-2896
Samuele E A TestaDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland.
Prajwal PadmanabhaDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6819-5890
Daniel MachadoDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7491, Norway.
Sara MitriDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3930-5357

Funding

Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne Internal fundingNational Center of Competence in Research Microbiomes 51NF40_180575Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (SNF) PCEGP3_181272Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (SNF) TMPFP3_217172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resource supply is generally considered a dominant driver of microbial diversity. Here, using a four-species bacterial consortium, we asked whether coexistence can emerge from interactions between species rather than being dictated by the external environment. Across 31 simple nutrient conditions, including 16 single-resource environments, all four species survived and coexisted over eight growth-and-dilution cycles. We then chose 28 additional conditions to further probe the boundaries of coexistence by varying resource concentrations, temporal dynamics, nutrient complexity and relief of auxotrophy-driven dependencies, and only observed the extinction of a single species in one of these conditions. Although the community composition in each environment was largely shaped by species' fitness on the supplied resources, experimental assays and consumer-resource modeling showed that the coexistence was explained by cross-feeding and niche partitioning of metabolic byproducts. These metabolic interactions were strong enough to sustain coexistence even for species that failed to exhibit significant growth on the supplied resources in monoculture. Furthermore, robust coexistence across environments appears to be an emergent property of the community itself, ingrained in the members' metabolic byproduct profiles and niche differences. These findings demonstrate that the richness of microbial consortia is ultimately governed by these intrinsic metabolic traits, rather than being strictly dictated by the number or identity of the externally supplied resource.

Indexed as

BacteriaMicrobial ConsortiaModels, Biologicalcoexistenceconsumer–resource modelingcross-feedingmicrobial interactionssynthetic communities

Identifiers

PMID42752228
PMCPMC13598246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.