ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026
Flight energetics of barn swallows across speeds: high aerodynamic efficiency, but low energy conversion efficiency.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bird flight conversion efficiency (η) determines the amount of metabolic power (Pmet) transformed into mechanical power (Pmech) to remain aloft, and it is central to understanding animal flight energetics, yet it remains difficult to quantify. Using 13C-labelled sodium bicarbonate (NaBi) and particle image velocimetry (PIV), we measured Pmet and Pmech, respectively, in un-instrumented barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) flying across 7.8 to 13.6 m s-1 in a wind tunnel. Both Pmet and Pmech showed the expected U-shaped relationship with airspeed. Whole-animal η showed a shallow peak at 7% at 11 m s-1. Partial efficiency (ηp), estimated from horizontal and 4 deg climbing flight, was 27% (95% confidence interval CI: -2 to 56.1). Compared with thrush nightingales previously studied under identical conditions, barn swallows exhibited higher weight-specific flight Pmet but lower lift-specific Pmech, reflecting a higher basal metabolic rate but greater aerodynamic efficiency in barn swallows. Barn swallows showed lower peak and flatter η curve across speeds compared with that of the nightingales, suggesting a trade-off between flight energetics and flight speed: higher efficiency peak over a narrow speed range (thrush nightingales) versus lower, more consistent efficiency across a broader speed range (barn swallows). Whereas nightingales fly mainly during migration, barn swallows spend much of the day airborne and use a wider range of flight speeds, potentially favouring versatility over a narrow η peak. Although η has been studied in few species, our results suggest that η is both species and speed dependent, probably shaped by species-specific ecological demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.