ReviewCA: a cancer journal for clinicians
Advances in therapeutic approaches to gastric cancer.
Review in CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A changing landscape in gastric cancer.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gastric cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with nearly 1 million new cases diagnosed annually. Despite innovations in diagnosis, most patients still present at advanced stages, contributing to a poor prognosis. For early gastric cancer, endoscopic resection or minimally invasive surgery has become standard, offering comparable oncologic outcomes with faster recovery compared with open surgery. In locally advanced disease, resection of the primary lesion and D2 lymphadenectomy, defined as dissection of lymph nodes along two levels of blood vessels supplying the stomach, remains the cornerstone of curative surgery, whereas perioperative chemotherapy, particularly oxaliplatin-based regimens, has demonstrated improved survival benefits compared with surgery alone. The integration of immunotherapy into perioperative therapy for locally advanced disease and first-line palliative therapy for metastatic disease represents a paradigm shift, with programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy significantly improving pathologic complete response rates and overall survival, especially in programmed death ligand 1-positive and microsatellite instability-high tumors. Targeted agents include claudin 18.2 antibody, with zolbetuximab establishing a new first-line standard for claudin 18.2-positive disease, and antibody-drug conjugates, such as trastuzumab deruxtecan for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive disease, both of which have revolutionized treatment paradigms. Emerging strategies include dual immune checkpoint inhibition, bispecific antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, and fibroblast growth factor receptor 2b-targeting agents. Ultimately, the field is moving toward personalized, biomarker-driven approaches within multidisciplinary frameworks, although overcoming acquired resistance and addressing global disparities in therapeutic access remain important challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.