ArticleJournal of food science2026
The Impact of Environmental, Nutritional, and Animal Welfare Labeling of Plant-Based Cream Cheese on Consumer Perception.
Article in Journal of food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plant-based alternatives (PBAs) to dairy products are increasingly positioned as nutritionally beneficial, sustainable, and ethical food choices; however, consumer acceptance of PBAs remains limited, partly due to sensory challenges and uncertainty surrounding effective product communication strategies. This study investigated the influence of environmental, nutritional, and animal welfare labeling on consumer perception of plant-based cream cheese (PBCC). A total of 114 consumers evaluated the same commercially available PBCC under four labeling conditions: blinded (control) and with statements about nutritional benefits, environmental benefits, and animal welfare. Participants completed hedonic evaluations of appearance, flavor, texture, and overall liking; check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions for sensory and emotional attributes; and a willingness-to-purchase question. Prior to sensory testing, participants also completed word association tasks and comment questions to assess baseline perceptions of PBCC. Sensory properties, particularly creaminess, smoothness, and spreadability characteristics, emerged as central drivers of consumer expectations and acceptance. Labeling significantly influenced consumer responses despite the product remaining unchanged. Nutritional and animal welfare claims significantly increased overall liking compared to the control (p < 0.05), while animal welfare labeling also significantly improved the texture liking and willingness to purchase scores. Environmental labeling produced comparatively weaker effects. CATA results demonstrated that nutritional and animal welfare labels were associated with more favorable sensory and emotional responses, supporting the presence of a label-induced halo effect. These findings suggest that strategic nutritional and ethical messaging may enhance consumer acceptance of PBCCs. The results provide valuable insight for the development and marketing of plant-based dairy alternatives. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: The findings of this study provide insight for manufacturers and marketers of plant-based alternatives seeking to improve consumer acceptance of plant-based cream cheese. Results demonstrate that nutritional and animal welfare labeling can positively influence consumer perception, overall liking, and willingness to purchase, even when product formulation remains unchanged. Animal welfare claims showed the strongest positive influence, indicating that ethical messaging may resonate more strongly than environmental sustainability claims for this product. However, sensory properties remain important, as smoothness, spreadability, dairy-like characteristics, and the absence of aftertaste were identified as critical drivers of acceptance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.