Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42751763›Full record

ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2026

Nutritional and Functional Potential of Rapeseed and Canola Proteins: Advances in Protein Extraction, Phenolic Removal, and Food Applications.

Akhilesh Modi, Smriti Shrestha, Stefan Kasapis, Sushil Dhital, Amit Arora

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Akhilesh ModiIITB Monash Research Academy, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Smriti ShresthaDepartment, of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Stefan KasapisSchool of Science, RMIT University, Bundoora West Campus, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sushil DhitalDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Bioresource Processing Research Institute of Australia (BioPRIA), Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9405-1244
Amit AroraBioprocessing Laboratory, Centre for Technology Alternatives for Rural Areas, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8085-9629

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oilseeds, such as rapeseed and canola, are promising plant protein sources, containing approximately 35%-50% protein on a dry weight basis, comparable to soy (30%-55%) and pea (23%-30%). However, their application in foods is limited by anti-nutritional factors (ANFs), residual oils, and phenolic compounds, which impair solubility, digestibility, and functional performance. This review critically evaluates protein extraction and refining strategies from rapeseed and canola meals, emphasizing phenolic removal to enhance functionality. Conventional alkaline extraction followed by isoelectric precipitation often co-extracts phenolics and partially denatures proteins, whereas alternative approaches, including mild salt-assisted extraction, ethanol-assisted phenolic removal, ultrasonication, pulsed electric fields, enzyme-assisted extraction, green solvents, and ultrafiltration, improve protein yield (65%-94%), reduce total phenolics (50%-99%), and preserve native cruciferin and napin structures. Phenolic management enhances solubility (20%-80% pH 4-8), emulsifying activity (EAI 200-650 m

Indexed as

Brassica napusBrassica rapaPhenolsPlant ProteinsFood HandlingNutritive ValuePhenolsPlant Proteinsanti‐nutritional factorsfood applicationsfunctional propertiesmeat analogsphenolic removalprotein‐extractionrapeseed and canola meal

Identifiers

PMID42751763
PMCPMC13584239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.