ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2026
Visiting Hours and Visitor Numbers During the Postnatal Period: The Basis for a Patient-Centred Visiting Policy on the Postnatal Ward.
Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many hospitals introduced restrictive visiting arrangements to reduce the risk of infection. This situation provided an opportunity to assess the acceptance of clearly defined visiting hours and visitor numbers on the postnatal ward. The aim of this study was to examine these regulations from the perspective of postpartum women and their support persons, and to identify implications for a sustainable long-term visiting policy. Materials and Methods: A single-centre retrospective survey study enrolled women who had given birth at the Perinatal Centre of Klagenfurt am Wörthersee Hospital between October 2020 and December 2021. Data were collected 1-2 years postpartum using a purpose-designed, standardised and internally piloted questionnaire. The number of visitors, visiting hours and subjectively perceived effects on well-being, breastfeeding and the mother-child bond were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. In addition, exploratory subgroup analyses were carried out on obstetric and sociodemographic parameters. Results: 540 questionnaires were analysed (response rate 26.9%). The restriction on visitor numbers was viewed positively overall (postpartum women: mean 2.2; support persons: mean 2.4), whilst the time restrictions were viewed more critically (mean 3.0 and 3.2 respectively). Primiparous women, postpartum women who experienced complications, those who had undergone an unscheduled cesarean, and those whose newborns had been admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit rated the restrictions significantly more negatively. The reported effects on rest, well-being, breastfeeding and bonding were based solely on subjective assessments. Conclusion: Limited visitor numbers are generally viewed positively during the postnatal period, whereas strict time restrictions are viewed more critically. The findings support a structured yet flexible visiting policy that prioritises the involvement of close support persons and allows for exceptions in cases with difficult clinical courses. Given the retrospective design, the response rate and the exclusively subjective end points, causal statements can only be made to a limited extent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.