Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42751707›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

Complication Rates in Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Sjoerd F P van der Velden, Daan J Rademakers, Tong Xi, Tim H J Nijhuis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sjoerd F P van der VeldenFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Daan J RademakersFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tong XiDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tim H J NijhuisFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Facial feminization surgery (FFS) is vital for the well-being of transgender women and nonbinary individuals. FFS procedures involve different surgical techniques that are accompanied by a broad range of complications. This article aims to identify the complication risks of surgical procedures applied in FFS following the Clavien-Dindo classification. Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were queried. Data were acquired and divided into 6 subgroups, covering all feminization features of the face and neck, including combined procedures. Results: Forty-eight studies were included in the systematic review. The cohorts ranged from 4 to 1049 patients. The follow-up ranged from 3 weeks to 110 months. The overall risk incidence of complications, including infection, nonunion of bony fragments, and deep venous thrombosis after surgery, was less than 5% across all subgroups regarding the face and neck. The complication rate for combined surgery was 5.3%. Conclusions: This article describes a low incidence of complications following FFS, suggesting that these are safe procedures with minimal risks to patients. The identified risk ratios can aid clinicians and patients in making informed decisions regarding the selection of appropriate surgical techniques in FFS.

Identifiers

PMID42751707
PMCPMC13581374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.