Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42751704›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Trends in Opioid Prescriptions Based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) Database From 2008 to 2022.

Zachary Negin, Kyra Cui, Amar Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zachary NeginEngineering, Washington Township High School, Sewell, USA.
Kyra CuiClinical Support Decision Group, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.
Amar GuptaClinical Support Decision Group, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpioid prescription practices in the United States have changed substantially over the past 25 years in response to government policies, medical guidelines, and the opioid epidemic. METHODOLOGY: The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) version 3.1 database comprises de-identified patient encounters from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) in Massachusetts, United States. Data were analyzed using Structured Query Language (SQL) via Google BigQuery. Patients were grouped into three-year cohorts to further protect confidentiality.

resultsBetween 2008 and 2022, data from 364,627 patient admissions were evaluated, including 1,150,944 opioid prescriptions. The percentage of patients receiving opioids decreased from 46.5% (47,273 of 101,607) in the 2008-2010 cohort to 33.6% (16,545 of 49,173) in the 2020-2022 cohort. The number of prescriptions per patient also decreased, from 9.9 in the 2008-2010 cohort to 5.8 in the 2020-2022 cohort. Furthermore, the total prescribed strength per patient decreased from 829 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) in the 2008-2010 cohort to 508 MME in the 2020-2022 cohort. These decreases were consistent across all cohorts during the study period.

conclusionsThese findings are consistent with other studies from the United States and internationally demonstrating declines in the volume and potency of opioid prescriptions during this period. Despite these reductions, opioid-related deaths increased over the same period. These trends persisted across the recognized waves of the opioid epidemic. Although previous studies have reported opioid prescription data from the MIMIC database, our findings provide the most up-to-date analysis spanning the opioid epidemic.

Indexed as

mimic-iv databaseopioid epidemicpain managementprescriptionstrends

Identifiers

PMID42751704
PMCPMC13581439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.