ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Does Research Predict Career Trajectory? A Nationwide Analysis of Plastic Surgery Residents From 2020 to 2024.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Selection of applicants for plastic surgery training is based on multiple criteria, with an increasing emphasis on scholarly productivity. However, it is unclear whether research productivity before training predicts future academic success in residency or practice. This study examines the association between research productivity before residency and subsequent career trajectory in the modern era. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of graduates from all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited integrated and independent plastic surgery training programs between 2020 and 2024. Collected variables included demographic characteristics, training program attributes, and posttraining career trajectory. Research productivity was assessed by the number of peer-reviewed publications at the time of application, during integrated or independent residency, and after training. Results: A total of 1049 plastic surgeons were included in the study. Applicants pursuing independent pathways had significantly fewer publications at the time of general surgery residency application than those applying for integrated programs, but had accumulated more publications at the time of plastic surgery application than integrated applicants. The completion of a 1-year fellowship predicted a long-term career in academia versus private practice ( Conclusions: Scholarly productivity has assumed an increasingly prominent role in the evaluation of plastic surgery applicants. However, research productivity before residency may not predict future academic success or practice. Further work to evaluate the relationship between research productivity and clinical skills may help elucidate the usefulness of this metric in the residency selection process.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.