Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42751654›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Cognitive Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Fatima Faisal, Andrew J Boileau

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fatima FaisalNeurology, Saba University School of Medicine, The Bottom, BES.
Andrew J BoileauNeuroscience and Neurology, Saba University School of Medicine, The Bottom, BES.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a form of exercise that alternates between periods of high-intensity effort and lower-intensity recovery. This review examined the effects of HIIT on cognitive function in healthy older adults. A search of the PubMed, EBSCOhost (APA PsycInfo, MEDLINE Complete, and Sociology Source Ultimate), and Epistemonikos databases was conducted using database-specific search strategies based on the concepts of high-intensity interval training (HIIT), cognition, and older adults. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving healthy adults aged 60 years or older. Five studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the current evidence does not support a consistent benefit of HIIT for improving overall cognitive function in healthy older adults. However, some studies reported improvements in specific cognitive domains, including working memory and hippocampal-dependent learning, rather than generalized improvements in cognition. Interpretation of the findings was limited by heterogeneous cognitive outcome measures and the use of active exercise comparator groups, making it difficult to isolate the specific effects of HIIT. Further high-quality longitudinal RCTs are needed to determine whether HIIT provides meaningful cognitive benefits beyond conventional exercise modalities.

Indexed as

cognitive functionelderlyhigh intensity interval trainingnormal agingolder adults

Identifiers

PMID42751654
PMCPMC13580880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.