ArticleInternational journal for research in learning disabilities2026
Memory Consolidation in Adults With and Without Developmental Language Disorder and Dyslexia.
Article in International journal for research in learning disabilities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developmental language disorder (DLD) and dyslexia are common language-based learning disabilities that often co-occur, prompting debate regarding the nature of overlap in their learning and memory profiles. The current study examined how young adults with and without DLD or dyslexia learn and consolidate declarative, procedural, and speech-sound information over a 12-hour period. Participants completed learning tasks in the morning or evening and were retested on their performance after 12 hours. Declarative memory performance improved after 12 hours among evening-trained participants without DLD but not in morning-trained participants, nor in participants with DLD. Procedural memory performance improved after 12 hours among all participants without DLD, but not in participants with DLD. Sensitivity to the learned speech sounds improved after 12 hours across all participants. Together, these findings suggest that the time course of learning and consolidation differs across different types of learning and across different learning disability subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42751640PMC13580623What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.