ArticleOTO open
Investigating Neotongue Atrophy and Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Glossectomy With Free Flap Tongue Reconstruction.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Following glossectomy, tongue reconstruction via autologous free flap can reapproximate native form and function, significantly improving postoperative quality of life. Various studies have examined functional outcomes between the commonly employed radial forearm free flap (RFFF) and the anterolateral thigh free flap (ALTFF); however, changes in neotongue volumetric bulk are less clearly understood. Study Design: We aimed to assess postoperative outcomes and volume changes in patients undergoing glossectomy. Setting: This is a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent glossectomy with reconstruction at a single academic center. Methods: Patients who underwent hemiglossectomy with RFFF or ALTFF reconstruction were retrospectively identified. Patient demographics, past medical history, and treatment course were collected. Perioperative imaging was utilized to measure native tongue, tumor, and postoperative neotongue volumes. Results: Of 35 patients identified, ALTFF patients presented with greater tumor stage and depth of invasion than RFFF patients. Volumetric analysis of 17 patients revealed a mean tongue size decrease of 31.68 cm Conclusion: Postoperative neotongue volume decreased in both the ALTFF and RFFF cohorts over time but was not impacted by flap type or tumor burden. Further research is warranted to understand the impact of flap design on neotongue atrophy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.