ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026
Readiness for Prenatal Genomic Medicine: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Obstetricians' Competence and Attitudes Toward Whole-Exome Sequencing in Xinjiang, China.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: As prenatal whole-exome sequencing (WES) becomes increasingly available, general obstetricians need to identify appropriate candidates for referral, while maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) specialists are involved in WES-related counseling, testing decisions, and pregnancy management. This study assessed obstetricians' self-reported competence and attitudes toward prenatal WES and explored MFM specialists' perspectives in Xinjiang, a geographically vast and resource-limited region in northwestern China. Methods: A two-stage cross-sectional survey was conducted between April 2025 and February 2026 using self-administered questionnaires. In the first-stage survey, 849 questionnaires were collected from obstetricians providing antenatal care across Xinjiang, of which 666 were valid and included. The second-stage survey was completed by 36 of 71 eligible MFM specialists. The surveys evaluated self-perceived competence, attitudes toward WES indications, and MFM specialists' perspectives on testing strategies, timing, and result disclosure. Group comparisons used non-parametric tests, and multivariable binary logistic regression identified factors associated with self-reported competence. Results: Among 666 obstetricians, self-perceived competence was lowest for WES and single-gene disorders across different technologies and genetic disorders, respectively. MFM specialization was the factor most consistently associated with higher self-reported competence (OR range: 3.07-6.36; all Conclusion: Obstetricians in Xinjiang showed favorable attitudes toward prenatal WES but limited self-perceived competence in counseling and interpretation. These findings highlight a gap between the expanding use of genomic testing and clinicians' perceived preparedness, emphasizing the need for targeted education and clearer clinical guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.