Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42751601›Full record

ArticleStat (International Statistical Institute)2025

G-estimation with partial interference.

Kayla W Kilpatrick, Bradley C Saul, Michael G Hudgens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stat (International Statistical Institute), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kayla W KilpatrickDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Bradley C SaulDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Michael G HudgensDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Biostatstics for Research in Environmental HealthT32ES007018 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel, Rebecca Fry · 1985 to 2026
$31.3M
Causal Inference in Infectious Disease Prevention StudiesR01AI085073 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HUDGENS, MICHAEL G · 2010 to 2024
$4.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI085073NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the study of infectious disease interventions, one individual's treatment may affect another individual's outcome, i.e., there may be interference. In this paper, methods are developed to draw inference about causal effects when interference may be present in observational studies. The special case of partial interference is considered wherein individuals within a cluster may interfere with one another, but they cannot interfere with individuals in other clusters. Existing methods that handle partial interference utilize inverse probability weighting or the g-formula. Some of these methods require correctly specifying parametric models and often do not perform well in the presence of large clusters. In this paper a G-estimation approach is considered instead which is able to handle larger clusters. Singly-robust and doubly-robust G-estimators of overall effects, effects when treated, and effects when untreated are proposed. The large sample properties of the estimators are derived using estimating equation theory. Simulation studies are presented to demonstrate the finite-sample performance of the proposed estimators. The 2013-14 Demographic and Health Survey in the Democratic Republic of the Congo is analyzed to estimate the effects of bed net use on malaria prevalence.

Indexed as

Causal inferenceg-estimationinterferencemalaria

Identifiers

PMID42751601
PMCPMC13580532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.