ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2026
Consensus Recommendations for Patients with Complex Dispositions: A Modified Delphi Study Among the Strengthening Essential Emergency Departments (SEED).
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Some emergency department (ED) patients have complex needs requiring hospitalization but lack acute conditions that meet inpatient admission criteria. Although common, these cases have received little national attention. We convened emergency medicine experts to propose definitions, barriers, and calls to action for this population. Methods: We conducted a modified Delphi study using iterative online surveys and an inperson meeting. Panelists were recruited from Strengthening Essential EDs (SEED), a consortium of 15 United States (US) academic safety-net hospitals. Panelists were asked to rank agreement with survey items on a 5-point Likert scale, with elimination of items that failed to reach consensus (defined as <3.75) after each round. Between rounds, we integrated all panelist suggestions and distributed anonymous controlled feedback. The inperson discussion used a modified Liberating Structures framework to elicit feedback, which was used to edit items in real time. Results: In total, 35 of 67 (52.2%) panelists from 12 of 15 (80%) institutions attended the inperson discussion, and 22 panelists from 13 institutions participated in ≥1 Delphi survey. The panel reached consensus on a single term and definition-recommending "patients with complex dispositions" defined as "a patient who requires hospitalization due to complex disposition planning needs and identified barriers to safe discharge." The panel also reached consensus on 5 key barriers and 6 calls to action for future work. Conclusions: We recommend the term "patients with complex dispositions" to describe patients who require hospitalization due to identified barriers to safe discharge. This term, along with the proposed definition, identified barriers, and calls to action, should be considered and evaluated by a larger and more diverse stakeholder group in the future. We further encourage future work by multidisciplinary teams to evaluate and address this issue in the US health care system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.