SynthesisResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2026
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with mechanical circulatory support: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is increasingly being used for providing hemodynamic support in patients with advanced cardiogenic shock. Despite its benefits, it continues to carry a significantly high risk of multiple complications. The use of anticoagulation is crucial to prevent device-related and patient-related thrombosis in MCS-treated patients. Heparin use is complicated by the risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Objectives: We sought to describe the incidence and outcomes of HIT in patients with MCS. Methods: We performed a systematic search in Embase and Medline and included all studies reporting the incidence of HIT in cohorts of patients who underwent placement of MCS. Case series and case reports and studies describing the incidence of HIT in patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were excluded. Data were pooled in a single-arm, proportion meta-analysis for each outcome (incidence of HIT, rate of thrombotic events, and overall mortality). Results: We screened 438 studies, and 17 met inclusion criteria. We found an overall incidence rate of HIT of 7% among patients receiving MCS, and when assessing the incidence rate based on MCS device, the rate was 6% for Impella, 8% for left-ventricular assist device, and 7% for intra-aortic balloon pump. Furthermore, the incidence rate of thrombotic events was 42%. The rate of bleeding complications was reported only in 1 study. The mortality rate among HIT cases while on MCS was 41%. Conclusion: Patients who are managed with MCS are at high risk of HIT, which results in significant morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.