ArticleCureus2026
Designing and Delivering a Task-Based, Structured, Standardized Patient Encounter Session in Clinical Skills Courses.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical skills (CS) are linchpins of medical school curricula, integrated across all four years of training. Medical schools vary noticeably in how they deliver CS content, particularly during the pre-clerkship years, and much of that variability reflects the absence of a standardized structure for small group CS sessions. A well-defined session structure ensures consistent learning opportunities to practice the full range of required clinical reasoning-based tasks: hypothesis-driven history taking, physical examination, prioritized differential diagnosis formulation, diagnostic and initial therapeutic planning, encounter closure, and oral case presentation. Given the inherent constraints of allotted session time and course duration, ensuring equitable student participation in a small group setting is a persistent challenge. To address this, we developed a structured approach to delivering standardized patient encounter-based CS content that allows regular practice of all assigned session tasks throughout the course. Upon introduction of the new method, students immediately recognized its positive impact; a sentiment that triggered adopting the method among faculty and then conducting a study to explore students' insight into its effectiveness. The study included a five-point Likert scale survey, related open-ended questions, and statistical and content analyses. The results showed high ratings (4.27/5 and 4.31/5), supported by positive sentiments on the impact on skills development, teamwork, and opportunities to practice a comprehensive range of CS. Our task-based, structured, standardized patient encounter method not only promotes equitable learning opportunities but could also enhance CS acquisition through basic clinical sciences integration and optimization of faculty capacity to deliver CS sessions and evaluate students' learning effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.