ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Explainable machine learning for age-specific talent identification in Chinese youth football.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: To identify elite youth football players in China, we developed an interpretable machine learning model. Methods: We modeled each age group separately to track changes in predictive factors across different age groups. A cross-sectional analysis included 398 players from the 2024 Yunnan Football Association Elite Training Camp (U8 to U12). All participants underwent a multidimensional assessment covering anthropometric, physical, technical, psychological, and match performance dimensions. In our prediction model, coaches' selection of provincial elite players was used as the outcome variable. Three classifiers: XGBoost, Random Forest, and Logistic Regression, were trained with hyperparameter tuning and 5-fold cross-validation. Then we used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to interpret our models. Results: The best-performing model demonstrated high discriminative ability (test set ROC-AUC: 0.900-0.957). SHAP analysis indicated that dribbling speed and standing long jump consistently mattered at all ages, while sprint performance were especially important for the U8 and U10 groups. Notably, for U12 males, left-foot shooting skill was the strongest predictor, while for U12 females, tactical awareness during matches emerged as most important. Psychological traits contributed little predictive value. When we applied retrospectively to national selection data, the U12M model showed fair agreement (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.