ArticleSurgery open science2026
Gender bias, job satisfaction, and burnout among surgeons: Evidence from Korea.
Article in Surgery open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study examines the relationships between formal and informal gender bias and burnout among surgeons, and it assesses whether job satisfaction mediates these associations differently for women and men. We conducted a nationwide survey of practicing surgeons in Korea, and the primary exposures were experiences of formal gender bias (e.g., hiring, pay, promotion, and leadership opportunities) and informal gender bias (e.g., exclusion from networks, limited access to resources, and derogatory or gendered comments). Key outcome variables were overall job satisfaction and burnout. Analyses were stratified by gender, and mediation models were used to explore indirect pathways through job satisfaction. Results: Women surgeons reported substantially higher exposure to formal (62.5% vs. 11.3%) and informal (83.9% vs. 19.2%) gender bias than men. For both women and men, formal gender bias was associated with lower job satisfaction, and the relationship between formal gender bias and burnout appeared to operate indirectly through job satisfaction. Informal gender bias was also associated with lower job satisfaction for both genders. For men, informal gender bias retained a direct positive association with burnout after accounting for job satisfaction, while for women the association between informal gender bias and burnout was consistent with an indirect pathway through job satisfaction. Conclusions: Gender bias is strongly linked to burnout among surgeons, operating largely through job satisfaction but with important gender-specific differences. Organizational strategies that enhance equity and job satisfaction may reduce burnout, while targeted efforts to address informal, interpersonal bias are needed to further mitigate burnout risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.