ArticleFood chemistry: X2026
Simple presoaking modulates phytochemical recovery, antioxidant capacity, and macrophage responses of onion skin extracts.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Onion skin is a phenolic-rich by-product, but practical preprocessing strategies for directing phytochemical recovery remain insufficiently defined. This study evaluated whether brief presoaking in water, 5% vinegar, 1% citric acid, a vinegar-citric acid mixture, or 0.3% H₂O₂ for 4-12 min altered subsequent methanol-reference and hot-water extracts. Extraction yield, phenolic and flavonoid indices, quercetin markers, UHPLC-Orbitrap HRMS profiles, DPPH activity, and RAW 264.7 responses were assessed. Presoaking solution affected all major variables more consistently than duration. Across treatments, yields ranged from 5.78 to 10.67% for methanol and 6.87-10.53% for hot-water extracts, yet higher yield did not indicate greater phenolic density. Methanol preferentially recovered quercetin aglycone, whereas hot water produced a more polar profile. The 0.3% H₂O₂ condition showed favorable antioxidant performance without marked loss of metabolic viability. However, mild oxidative preprocessing requires further validation of peroxide removal, safety, and regulatory compliance before practical food application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.