ReviewPublic health challenges2026
Climate Justice and One Health Adaptation Policies in Public Health and Disaster Medicine.
Review in Public health challenges, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Climate change is intensifying public health risks and placing increasing pressure on disaster medicine systems. These challenges require adaptation strategies that incorporate climate justice principles and the One Health framework. Objective: This scoping review aimed to examine how climate justice and One Health principles are incorporated into public health and disaster medicine adaptation policies. Methods: A scoping review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guideline using major scientific databases (Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science) and global health organization resources published between 01 January 2005 and 31 October 2025. Critical appraisal of included evidence was assessed using design‑specific tools: the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for systematic reviews and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for mixed‑methods studies. Data were synthesized to assess the degree of public health engagement in climate adaptation and the incorporation of climate justice and One Health principles. Results: Out of a total of 19,835 records, eight eligible studies were included. The eight studies comprised six review articles and two mixed‑methods studies, with geographic coverage, including Pakistan, the United States, Greece and multi‑country or global analyses. Findings reveal persistent inequities in climate-related health impacts, particularly among marginalized and resource-limited populations. Health sector participation in national adaptation plans remains limited, with policies often fragmented, mitigation-oriented or insufficiently aligned with One Health principles. Structural inequalities, weak governance, gender disparities and limited multisector coordination hinder equitable adaptation. Climate stressors, including extreme weather events, air pollution, vector-borne diseases and environmental degradation, disproportionately affect communities with the lowest adaptive capacity. Conclusions: There is an urgent need for standardized vulnerability assessment frameworks, stronger multisector collaboration, improved early-warning systems and enhanced capacity building through international public health institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.