Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42751426›Full record

ReviewNational science review2026

A paradigm shift in all-solid-state lithium batteries: halide cathode materials streamlined for multi-electron reactions.

Yang Luo, Yuhao Duan, Xiaofei Yang, Xueliang Sun, Xianfeng Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in National science review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yang LuoSchool of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China.
Yuhao DuanDalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.
Xiaofei YangDalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2713-9681
Xueliang SunEastern Institute for Advanced Study, Eastern Institute of Technology, Ningbo 315200, China.
Xianfeng LiDalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Halide cathode active materials (CAMs) are emerging as a transformative platform for all-solid-state lithium batteries (ASSLBs), offering intrinsic high ionic/electronic conductivities, multi-electron transfer capability and the unique potential for single-phase electrode architectures that eliminate inactive components. Despite these advantages, critical challenges regarding their reaction mechanisms, interfacial stability and structural evolution during cycling remain inadequately addressed. In this review, we systematically trace the evolution of halide CAMs from liquid electrolyte systems to ASSLBs, focusing on recent breakthroughs in single-phase interface engineering and multi-electron reaction mechanisms. We highlight how elemental and structural units govern ionic/electronic transport pathways and reversibility, while critically evaluating the dilemma between energy density and efficiency in the multi-electron reaction. Looking forward, a roadmap for next-generation halide CAM development is outlined, encompassing high-throughput material screening, controllable design of integrated all-in-one architectures and strategies to overcome voltage hysteresis and conversion kinetics limitations. By bridging fundamental insights with practical engineering, this review aims to provide actionable guidance for realizing high-energy, cost-effective ASSLBs.

Indexed as

all-solid-state lithium batterieshalide cathodesion/electron conductionmulti-electron reaction mechanismssingle-phase interface

Identifiers

PMID42751426
PMCPMC13579703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.