Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42751409›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Improving the Clinical Interpretability of Inpatient Blood Glucose Monitoring Through a Standardized Documentation Chart: A Quality Improvement Study at a Tertiary Public Hospital in the Caribbean.

Christa Lyons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christa LyonsInternal Medicine, University of the West Indies, Kingston, JAM.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Accurate inpatient blood glucose documentation is essential for safe diabetes management, yet paper-based monitoring systems often record glucose values at clock time rather than during physiologically relevant monitoring periods. This quality improvement study evaluated whether implementing a standardized, timing-based diabetes monitoring chart improved the completeness and clinical interpretability of inpatient blood glucose documentation at a tertiary public hospital in the Caribbean. Materials and methods A two-cycle clinical audit was conducted over six months. Twenty-five adult medical inpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were evaluated before and after implementation of the intervention. The intervention consisted of a redesigned paper-based diabetes monitoring chart implemented hospital-wide, which recorded blood glucose measurements during pre-breakfast, pre-lunch, pre-supper, and bedtime monitoring periods, with adjacent documentation of insulin administration and staff education. The primary outcome was the proportion of clinically interpretable diabetes monitoring charts. Secondary outcomes included documentation of meal-related blood glucose timing, insulin administration in close proximity to blood glucose measurements, and incomplete diabetes monitoring charts. Results A total of 50 patient records were reviewed. Clinically interpretable documentation increased from 10/25 (40%) at baseline to 23/25 (92%, p < 0.001) following implementation. Documentation of meal-related blood glucose timing improved from 9/25 (36%) to 23/25 (92%, p < 0.001), while documentation of insulin administration adjacent to blood glucose measurements increased from 14/25 (56%) to 24/25 (96%, p < 0.001). Overall compliance with predefined documentation standards improved from 11/25 (44%) to 23/25 (92%, p < 0.001), and the number of incomplete diabetes monitoring charts decreased from 8/25 (32%) to 2/25 (8%, p = 0.074). Conclusions Implementation of a standardized timing-based diabetes monitoring chart was associated with marked improvements in the completeness and interpretability of inpatient blood glucose documentation. This simple, low-cost quality improvement intervention may enhance inpatient diabetes documentation in hospitals that continue to rely on paper-based medical records and could be adapted for use in other resource-limited healthcare settings.

Indexed as

blood glucose monitoringclinical auditdiabetes mellitusinpatient diabetesquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID42751409
PMCPMC13581279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.