ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Repeated voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring in hospitalised patients: a real-world cohort study of out-of-range exposure and concentration response to dose adjustment.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Longitudinal evidence on repeated voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in selected hospitalised patients is limited. We examined factors associated with out-of-range exposure and described concentration changes after dose adjustment in hospitalised patients undergoing repeated TDM. Methods: This retrospective, single-centre, longitudinal cohort study included hospitalised adults who received voriconazole and contributed at least three valid TDM episodes. Trough concentrations were classified as subtherapeutic (<1.0 μg/mL), in range (1.0-5.0 μg/mL), or supratherapeutic (>5.0 μg/mL). Bayesian mixed-effects logistic regression with weakly informative priors and patient-level random intercepts identified factors associated with each direction of out-of-range exposure. Adjacent TDM pairs with a documented dose change were analysed for return to range. Results: A total of 140 patients contributed 497 episodes; 72 (14.5%) were subtherapeutic and 145 (29.2%) supratherapeutic. In the 445-episode complete-case models, subtherapeutic exposure was associated with rifampin-like inducer co-administration (OR 16.48, 95% CrI 2.38-139.44) and lower daily dose (OR 0.45 per 100 mg, 95% CrI 0.29-0.66), whereas supratherapeutic exposure was associated with the Conclusion: In hospitalised patients undergoing repeated voriconazole TDM, the factors associated with subtherapeutic and supratherapeutic exposure differed by direction. After dose reduction, supratherapeutic concentrations frequently did not return to range; this descriptive pattern is compatible with several contributors, including resampling before a new steady state and voriconazole's nonlinear metabolism. These findings may help clinicians interpret repeated TDM results in complex inpatient settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.