Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42751396›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2026

metadeconfoundR: Covariate analysis of high-dimensional cross-sectional omics data.

Till Birkner, Chia-Yu Chen, Morgan Essex, Kilian Dahm, Ulrike Löber, Thomas Ulas, Víctor Hugo Jarquín-Díaz, Sofia Kirke Forslund-Startceva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Till BirknerMax-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2656-2821
Chia-Yu ChenMax-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1765-7132
Morgan EssexMax-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8758-7497
Kilian DahmSystems Medicine, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6819-2622
Ulrike LöberMax-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7468-9531
Thomas UlasSystems Medicine, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9785-4197
Víctor Hugo Jarquín-DíazMax-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3758-1091
Sofia Kirke Forslund-StartcevaMax-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4285-6993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Identifying disease biomarkers from large molecular datasets is complicated by correlated and confounded signals like comorbidities and treatment regimens, batch effects, and cohort biases. These effects bias statistical inference and clinical conclusions. Robust methodologies are fundamental for reliable biomarker discovery. Results: metadeconfoundR is an R package for conservative biomarker discovery in (multi-)omics case-control datasets. It has a scalable two-step confounder-aware statistical framework for retaining only associations with independent support. It identifies covariate-naive univariate associations between omics features and metadata, then re-evaluates these associations using parallel post-hoc nested linear model testing to account for potential confounders. Confounded associations are flagged if they fully reduce to at least one other variable. metadeconfoundR supports parallel computation for large-scale datasets, offers visualization and tools for interpreting results and secondary analyses. We benchmark metadeconfoundR against state-of-the-art methods for identifying biomarkers using simulated ground truth derived from microbiome data, and demonstrate its ability to disentangle confounding effects while preserving statistical power, offering particular advantage when multiple covariates are present. metadeconfoundR functions for any -omics data type with continuous or categorical metadata/covariates. Availability: metadeconfoundR is available on CRAN (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/metadeconfoundR/) and GitHub (https://github.com/TillBirkner/metadeconfoundR).

Identifiers

PMID42751396
PMCPMC13581263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.