ReviewResearch and reports in urology2026
Narrative Review: Telemedicine for Reducing Travel-Related Out-of-Pocket Costs Among Hong Kong Urological Patients and a Customized Tiered Consultation Pathway.
Review in Research and reports in urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted routine urological outpatient services in Hong Kong, imposing disproportionate travel burdens on outlying island and cross-border patients who rely on multi-stage ferry and bus journeys. Globally, existing teleurology cost evidence is dominated by Western private-vehicle models, and to date no peer-reviewed review has investigated teleurology cost outcomes in Hong Kong. This narrative review addresses this regional research gap by synthesizing international evidence and proposing a tiered workflow aligned with the Hospital Authority's 2022-2027 Smart Care strategy. Patients and Methods: PubMed, CINAHL Complete and MEDLINE were searched for primary quantitative studies published between January 2012 and December 2022. Studies were screened following standard PRISMA protocols, and methodological quality was appraised using CASP and JBI checklists. Findings were aggregated via narrative thematic synthesis. Results: Eleven eligible studies (9 cohort studies, 1 randomized controlled trial, 1 cross-sectional survey) were included in the final analysis. Four core patient cost themes were identified by evidence strength: travel time savings (81.8% of studies), direct transport expenditure reduction (72.7%), travel distance reduction (54.5%), and lost work opportunity cost (45.5%). Western mileage-based cost frameworks have limited applicability to Hong Kong's ferry-dominated public transit ecosystem. Conclusion: Evidence drawn predominantly from Western populations suggests that teleurology may reduce travel-related time and financial burdens for urology patients, with potential applicability to Hong Kong's remote island and cross-border patient groups. The proposed tiered consultation pathway represents a theoretically evidence-informed framework aligned with local digital healthcare policy, to support future telehealth pilot implementation and service optimization. As all included studies were conducted in North America and the United Kingdom, and the pathway has not been locally validated, its real-world effectiveness and cost-saving magnitude in Hong Kong remain to be confirmed in future primary research. Although this study focuses on the public healthcare setting in Hong Kong, the proposed telemedicine consultation pathway may serve as a reference clinical and operational blueprint for other highly urbanized regions with outlying islands or cross-border patient demographics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.