ArticleJournal of pediatrics. Clinical practice2026
Navigating Solid Food Introduction: A Qualitative Exploration of Caregivers' Beliefs, Readiness, and Influences on Infant Feeding Practices.
Article in Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate beliefs and practices during solid food introduction (SFI) among a diverse sample of parents/caregivers using a qualitative approach. SFI aspects evaluated included timing, approach, beliefs, family/cultural influences, environmental factors, and interactions with their pediatrician. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with parents of children between 7 and 13 months of age. Interview questions used the theory of planned behavior. Parents were recruited from academic, community, and private clinics in Chicago. Data were analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach, incorporating both deductive and inductive coding. Two researchers independently coded all interviews, and discrepancies were resolved through discussion and consensus. Results: A total of 49 interviews were conducted. Participants were primarily mothers (92%). By race, 21 (43%) identified as White, 14 (29%) as Black, 4 (8%) as Asian, 1 (2%) as Native American, 7 (14%) as mixed race or other, and 2 (4%) as unknown. By ethnicity, 14 (29%) identified as Latino or Hispanic. Twenty-eight participants (57%) had Medicaid. Most parents introduced solids between 5 and 6 months of age, primarily following pediatrician advice. Several major themes emerged around SFI: (1) conflicting beliefs about timing and caregiver readiness, (2) fear of choking, (3) parental control over feeding, (4) desire for a good start, (5) siblings shaping feeding practices, (6) cultural and family influences, and (7) adjusted feeding practices based on circumstances. Conclusions: Although numerous factors influence SFI, many caregivers relied on pediatric guidance as an anchor for decision-making. However, caregivers reported gaps in support and information, suggesting that more flexible, practical, and culturally responsive recommendations are needed to better align with families' diverse experiences and circumstances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.