ArticleJCPP advances2026
Reliability, validity, and change over time in disinhibited and disruptive behaviors assessed with the age-adapted disruptive behavior diagnostic observation schedule in children aged 5-12 years with ADHD.
Article in JCPP advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous research has shown that the disruptive behavior diagnostic observation schedule (DB-DOS) is a valid and reliable clinic-based assessment of disinhibited and disruptive behaviors in preschoolers. We adapted the DB-DOS for use in children aged 5-12 years, examined its psychometric properties, and evaluated its ability to capture change over time across repeated assessments. Methods: Children ( Results: PCA indicated that the correlational structure was captured by two components: Behavioral Regulation (BR; e.g., "Talks excessively," "Difficulty waiting") and Anger Modulation (AM; e.g., "Noncompliance," "Verbal aggression"). Inter-item correlations and associations between DB-DOS scores and parent and teacher reports provided partial support for validity, particularly in the parent context (PC). Internal consistency ranged from acceptable to good, and interrater reliability was excellent. Psychometric properties at 5 weeks and 1 year were broadly comparable to those at baseline. Changes in disinhibited and disruptive behaviors observed with the DB-DOS, particularly in the PC, showed modest associations with changes reported by parents and teachers. Conclusion: The age-adapted DB-DOS showed acceptable to good reliability and provided partial support for validity as a clinic-based observational tool for assessing disinhibited and disruptive behaviors in children aged 5-12 years with ADHD. Preliminary evidence suggests that the DB-DOS may capture change over time, particularly in the PC, although change cannot be attributed uniquely to intervention effects. This standardized clinic-based assessment method holds promise for supporting diagnostic assessment and intervention research in school-aged children with disinhibited and disruptive behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.